Celebrity Headphone Deathmatch - Monster and Beats by Dr. Dre

Monster Beats by Dr. Dre
My experience with Monster and Beats by Dre headphones is that they range from mediocre to abysmal. What I don't understand is how they claim they're all about getting people to hear the sound they hear in the studio, and then they so dramatically change the equalization of the headphones. In a recent interview in Time Out Hong Kong, Jimmy Iovine is quoted as saying:

It's all about authentic feel. There's a feel that happens in the studio, and a sound. The sound is a combination of capturing what actually was mixed in the studio. Most producers mix on similar curves. A lot of studios in the world are all to a similar curve and that produces a certain playback. So the producer mixes to that playback. And these headphones are made to service that --- to get the authentic feel out of the music.

I would think most recording studios in the world use a curve called "flat." That way they know what they're hearing on the monitors is what's going onto the disc. The Audio Engineering Society is filled with engineers who write papers and learn about how to achieve a flat and neutral audio response, and then design and build the gear that goes into recording studios. I've measured four of the Beats full-size headphones, and a handful of their in-ear models, and they deviate significantly from flat.

I'll add here that I have no problem with adding a little extra bass to headphones. Because you don't get the chest cavity compression and bone conduction from strong low notes on headphones that you would on speakers, I think it may be legitimate to dial up the bass a bit to compensate. On the graph below, the Etymotic and Sennheiser plots are quite flat below 1000Hz. The Jerry Harvey Audio JH16 has what I consider reasonable additional bass response with about 5dB of extra bass. But the Monster Turbine Copper has a whopping 12dB of extra energy in the lows, which is way too much. The Beats Solo really doesn't have any extra bass --- it's got a big hump around 200Hz and a very far from flat response.

111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_bassgraph


Frequency response plots of five headphones showing deviations from flat for elevating bass.

Another thing I keep hearing from the Beats team is that the iPod earbuds have ruined people's opportunity to hear good music. Again from the Time Out Hong Kong article:

Now, you can't get that [authentic] feel out of a $1 headphone. So when you buy a $400 mp3 player and $1 headphones, it gets clogged. So, I don't care where you are. I don't care if you're on the moon. You want the feel of the record to be authentic. And we've lost it --- almost two generations --- to bad sounds. Because everyone thought the iPod must have had a good headphone when it didn't. People said: "Oh I have to have the white headphone." Well, that white headphone didn't sound great. The mp3 player sounded great but the headphone is there to see if the thing works. Then you go and get a pair of decent headphones. Yes, everyone in the world, you want good-feeling headphones. Beats is good for anyone.

Recently I measured a couple of current iPod earbuds. I'll note here that I do think they have improved over time, but I think it would be educational to compare an iPod earbud to the very commonly purchased Beats Solo.

111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_ipodbudsolocompare

Frequency response comparison between Beats Solo and current Apple iPod earbud.

While the iPod earbud is seriously deficient in the bass response, between 200Hz and 10kHz it is significantly flatter than the Beats Solo. In my view, Iovine's comments above are 180 degrees off. Apple's iPod earbud is pretty darned good for a "$1" headphone, and we are now losing a generation of people too the bad sound of the Solo headphone. Additionally, those people will have paid not $1 but $200 for their headphones. I think it's shameful for a company that so strongly profits from headphone sales to tell people they'll be getting great sound and then deliver the type of performance I've measured.

Let's go through a couple of their headphones specifically:

Beats by Dre Studio ($349)
111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_studioThis was their first product, and I think probably their best. The good thing about these cans is that they don't fail in any way. The bad thing about them is they don't excel in any way either. Well ... they're good looking.

The sound quality is uneven and loose; the noise canceling is one of the poorest I've measured in noise canceling headphones; and you need batteries to keep them running. They are marginally better than the Ludacris SL300, though. My alternative suggestion is the Skullcandy Mix Master for a celebrity headphone, or the Bose Quite Comfort 15 for a noise canceling headphone.

Beats by Dre Pro ($449)
111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_proThis DJ headphone is not bad either. They play very loud and are quite easy to drive, but they're somewhat slow sounding with substantially rolled-off highs. They also have a lot of metal in their construction, which makes them quite heavy. The price is outrageous, in my opinion.

My favorite celebrity DJ headphones are the Skullcandy Mix Master and the V-Moda V-80 True Blood, both of which are very good sounding. Other very good DJ headphones are: the Pioneer HDJ2000; Beyerdynamic DT1350; V-Moda M-80; and the Sennheiser Adidas Original HD 25 (the Sennheiser HD 25-1 II is the same headphone).

InnerFidelity Beats Pro Full Review Here

Beats by Dre Solo ($199)
111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_solo I've talked about these already on this page, but I'll restate that I believe these headphones are a disservice to their purchasers and the music played on them. They're very widely available, and are sold with the promise of being able to hear what the artists hear in the studio. I think most people will say to themselves, "This is what studio quaity reproduction sounds like? Meh." I think these headphones are giving hi-fidelity a bad name.

Similarly priced celebrity cans that I woud recommend as alternatives are the Skullcandy Roc Nation Aviators; V-Moda V-80; and House of Marley Exodus. Non-celebrity alternates would be: the Sennheiser PX 200II; AKG K81DJ; and AKG K518LE.

InnerFidelity Beats Solo Full Review Here

Beats by Dre Solo HD ($229)
111212_feature_celebrityheadphonedeathmatch_beats_solohdWith only modestly better sound than the Solo, I find it shocking to see the "HD" moniker for High Definition being placed on these headphones. With the highest treble octave some 35dB down from the level of the lowest octave, these seem to me to be very far away from "High Definition."

Similarly priced celebrity cans that I'd recommend as alternatives are the Skullcandy Roc Nation Aviators; V-Moda V-80; and House of Marley Exodus. Non-celebrity alternates would be: the Sennheiser PX 200II; AKG K81DJ; and AKG K518LE.

Let's move on to the Ludacris cans ...

Share | |

X
Enter your InnerFidelity username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Loading